MediaWars WordPress

April 29, 2024

You Are NOT Freedom fighters, You Are Terrorists

Filed under: Foreign Relations,Politics — admin @ 7:24 pm

During the 1960s there was much unrest on American college campuses. Students were protesting against the American roll in the war in Vietnam, and for civil rights. Both of these were just causes. Today, we find young privileged American youth protesting against what they see as Jewish genocide in Israeli. What they don’t see is that they are the problem not the solution. They blame President Biden for his on going support for the Israeli democracy, and ignore the fact that it is the Palestinians who are both the aggressors and the ones with genocide on their minds. They chant from ‘Jordan to the sea’ which is simply a call for the annihilation of Jews. They forget that on October 7, 2023 that the Palestinian army known as HAMAS invaded Israel during an Israeli peace festival in southern Israel.

This is how it was described on Wikipedia:

“The attacks began early on 7 October with a barrage of at least 3,000 rockets launched against Israel and vehicle-transported and powered paraglider incursions into Israel. Hamas fighters breached the Gaza–Israel barrier, attacking military bases and massacring civilians in Gaza envelope Kibbutz settlements, including in Be’eri, Kfar Aza, and Nir Oz, and at the Nova music festival.] The attackers killed 1,139 people:[f] 695 Israeli civilians (including 36 children), 71 foreign nationals, and 373 members of the security forces.] About 250 Israeli civilians and soldiers were taken as hostages to the Gaza Strip, including 30 children, with the stated goal to force Israel to exchange them for imprisoned Palestinians, including women and children.] Reports of rape and sexual assault also emerged. Hamas officials denied the involvement of their fighters.

“Hamas said its attack was in response to the continued Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories, the blockade of the Gaza Strip, the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements, rising Israeli settler violence, and recent escalations.

“At least 44 countries denounced the attack as terrorism, while some Arab and Muslim countries blamed Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories as the root cause of the attack. The day was labeled the bloodiest in Israel’s history and the deadliest for Jews since the Holocaust. Some have called the attack a genocidal massacre against Israelis.”

Where was your outrage when this happened? What did you think the Israelis should do? Turn the other cheek. What do think would happen if Mexico did this to Texas? Where was your outrage when Putin’s Russia invaded the Ukraine? Whaere was your outrage when Assad slaughtered half a million Syrians? Why are you so outraged now? Could it be your anti-Semitism is showing?

While President Joe Biden, and his Secretary of State Anthony Blinken have been working tirelessly seeking a ceasefire, while all you do is to pollute, and clutter the university grounds you occupy with tents, garbage and who knows what while you chant anti-Semitic phrases. You invade administration buildings, and intimidate Jewish students. This is not free speech, and you are not the heroes of the oppressed. If there is going to be a ceasefire it is up to HAMAS, who are still holding hostages, not President Biden, or even Bibi Netanyahu. Why not take a moment to learn a thing or two about Jewish history, and you will find that this land you call Palestine was ancient Israel, and they were exiled from there homeland by the invading European Romans. It is then that the Palestinians took control and turned the land into a shithole. Only after the holocaust were the Jews allowed to return to their homeland. They sought to live peacefully with their Palestinian neighbors, but were rebuked by constant car bombings and sacrificial human bombers who strapped explosives to their bodies in an attempt to kill as many Jews as possible. This went on for years. After the 6-day war when Israel got Gaza and the West Bank they gave Gaza to the Palestinians who continuously lobbed rockets into Israel. Then in 2000 then President Clinton brokered the Oslo Accord. Finally there would be a 2 state solution, but then Palestinian leader Yassa Arafat balked, and who would blame him, after all Anwar Sadat of Egypt was assassinated after he reached a peace accord with Israel, and Israeli leader Itzhak Rabin who was the then Jewish leader was also assassinated. Who was behind the opposition? HAMAS!

I have an idea. If you are so unhappy with the situation in Gaza why don’t you go to Gaza and negotiate with HAMAS? I’m quite certain they will be willing to sit down with you, but I may be wrong. there is a far better chance that they will hold you as hostages like they are still holding over 100 Israelis, and Americans to this day. You are only allowed to demonstrate because you live in a free country like America. However, if you keep up your protests you will get Donald Trump reelected, and then you will get what you want, an America where people have NO rights. By the way keep your tents since you will need them after your graduation.

April 28, 2024

You Keep Me Hangin’ On

Filed under: Politics — admin @ 3:53 pm

Unlike the Holland, Dozier, Holland Supremes hit song of 1966, this hangin’ on has nothing to do with a love affair between a man, and a woman, but rather an illicit affair between an illegitimate relationship between a corrupt former president and the Supreme Court justices appointed by him. Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett all lied about Roe v. Wade during their senate confirmation hearings. They all claimed to adhere to stare decisis when it came to Roe, but quickly changed their minds during the Dobbs case. Key to their decision was that there was no right to privacy explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.

However, when the Colorado ballot initiative came before them they seemed to have put on blinders, as none of these textualists noticed that it clearly stated, in the 14th amendment, that an elected official who participated in an insurrection could only hold office again if 2/3 of Congress agreed to allow him to serve. Yet, these so-called originalists claimed that in order to have an impact this amendment would need congressional approval.

This brings us to the Jack Smith insurrection prosecution against Donald Trump. In December of 2023, after Trump’s attorneys had appealed his indictment on grounds of total presidential immunity. Attorney Smith asked the Supreme Court to take up the case on an expedited basis. They refused sending it to the appeals court which took until February to rule that Trump’s claims were bonkers. Trump appealed to the Supreme Court, and his judges. The Court agreed to take up the case, but put off the presentation until April 25th which was the last date that the Court was in session.

The hearing started off with Trump’s attorney making his presentation. The justices seemed skeptical of Trum’s claim of absolute immunity, but then the conservative justices began to ignore the case before them. Instead, they began dealing in future hypotheticals. Justice Alito posed the idea that some suture president would refuse to leave office because he would be afraid of being prosecuted by his successor. He totally ignored the fact that the defendant in this case had refused to leave office even though there had been no threat of prosecution at that time.

I doubt that the Court will grant full immunity for Trump since that would also give total immunity for President Biden. Instead expect them to kick this case back to the lower Court. Thus keeping us hangin’ on, thus allowing Trump to run for reelection which means he may never face prosecution for trying to overthrow the government of the United States.

April 9, 2024

Get Trump Out of Your Uterus

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , , — admin @ 2:57 pm

If you are a woman, or even a fair minded man you have to be aware that it was Donald J. Trump who did away with Roe v. Wade. It was this man, and this man alone who has created hardship for women across America. “After 50 years of failure, with nobody coming even close, I was able to kill Roe v. Wade, much to the ‘shock’ of everyone,”–Donald J. Trump. It was Trump along with the aid of Moscow Mitch McConnell who packed the Supreme Court with anti abortion pro life judges. First they stole a Supreme Court seat from Barack Obama after Antonin Scalia died by saying let the people decide during the upcoming election which was 10 months away. He filled that seat with Justice Neil Gorsuch who lied his ass off during his senate approval hearing. Then after Ruth Bader Ginsburg died only a month before the next election McConnell abandoned his former stand on let the people decide by rushing a hearing on Justice Amy Coney Barrett who also led her ass off about her stand on Roe v. Wade. In the interim Trump appointed Brett Kavanaugh another Justice who lied his ass off during his senate hearing.

The question is where did this stand of so-called prolife people come from? If you listen to them talk you would believe that is came straight from God, or at least from the Bible. Alas, no matter how hard I look I can find no such passage that bans abortion. The only thing that I could find were these passages from the Book of Numbers: “And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people. And if the woman be not defiled, but be clean; then she shall be free, and shall conceive seed.”--Numbers 5:27, 28. In other words this is a form of trial by ordeal, and is a form of abortion. The whole ordeal also demonstrates the male bias in the Bible.

In 1968, Christianity Today, the flagship magazine of evangelicalism, organized a conference with the Christian Medical Society to discuss the morality of abortion. This is what they concluded, “Whether the performance of an induced abortion is sinful we are not agreed,” the statement read, “but about the necessity of it and permissibility for it under certain circumstances we are in accord.” When the Roe decision was handed down, W. A. Criswell, pastor of First Baptist Church in Dallas and sometime president of the Southern Baptist Convention, issued a statement praising the ruling. “I have always felt that it was only after a child was born and had a life separate from its mother that it became an individual person,” Criswell declared, “and it has always, therefore, seemed to me that what is best for the mother and for the future should be allowed.”

According to Paul Weyrich, a conservative activist and architect of the Religious Right, the movement started in the 1970s in response to attempts on the part of the Internal Revenue Service to rescind the tax-exempt status of whites-only segregation academies (many of them church sponsored) and Bob Jones University because of its segregationist policies. Among those affected was Jerry Falwell, who referred to the civil rights movement as “civil wrongs” and who had opened his own segregation academy in 1967. The IRS actions against racially segregated institutions, not abortion, is what mobilized evangelical activists in the 1970s, and they directed their ire against a fellow evangelical, Jimmy Carter, in the run-up to the 1980 presidential election.

Weyrich’s genius, however, lay in his understanding that racism — the defense of racial segregation — was not likely to energize grassroots evangelical voters. So he, Falwell and others deftly flipped the script. Instead of the Religious Right mobilizing in defense of segregation, evangelical leaders in the late 1970s decried government intrusion into their affairs as an assault on religious freedom, thereby writing a page for the modern Republican Party playbook, used shamelessly in the Hobby Lobby and the Masterpiece Cakeshop cases.

Weyrich’s savvy sleight-of-hand conveniently failed to acknowledge that tax exemption is a form of public subsidy and that, pursuant to the Brown decision of 1954, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Green v. Connally ruling of 1971, the government has every right to stipulate that tax-exempt public institutions not engage in racial exclusion.

Now, Trump claims that abortion should be left to the states. Does this mean that a woman living in Texas has different needs than a woman living in Massachusetts, or that a woman living in Illinois has different needs than a woman living in Florida? This is insanity, but to be perfectly clear Donald Trump’s real agenda is a total national ban on abortion. This is what he tells his most ardent supporters. No, politics and religion have no place in a woman’s decision about her own body. Rather these are decisions to be made between a woman and her medical professional.

So, the only way to get Donald Trump out of your uterus is to vote for Joe Biden and other pro choice members of the Democratic party.

Powered by WordPress